4.7 Article

In vitro and preliminary in vivo toxicity screening of high-surface-area TiO2-chondroitin-4-sulfate nanocomposites for bone regeneration application

Journal

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages 347-356

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.02.027

Keywords

Titania-chondroitin-4 sulfate; Biocompatibility; In vitro bioactivity; Osteoblast cell line; Gene expression; Zebra fish

Funding

  1. UGC-DAE Consortium [CSR/Acctts/2010-11/1136]
  2. Metal Physics Section, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam node

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of this study was to prepare nontoxic, biomimetic TiO2/chondroitin-4-sulfate nanocomposites with osteointegration ability for biomedical applications. Nanocomposites with higher surface area were subjected to bioactivity study and obtained bone-like layer with stoichiometric Ca/P ratio of 1.64 and 1.66. The susceptibility of nanocomposites against Staphylococcus aureus (similar to 16 mm) and Escherichia coli (similar to 12 mm) is favorable in preventing the risk of bone diseases and postoperative infections. Adequate swelling and degradations properties were favorably achieved to reduce the risk of nanoparticle accumulation in cell organelles. Moreover, the toxicity in AGS cell line and biocompatibility in osteoblast-like MG-63 cell line showed no significant mitochondrial damage. In addition, the in vitro expression of osteoblast inducing genes (OCN, OPN, ALP and COL 1) and their up-regulation, and 20% of increased hatching rate in preliminary in vivo (zebrafish) analysis were favorable for the nanocomposite at the ratio of 2:0.50 than pure TiO2. Hence, it can be concluded that among the prepared nanocomposites TCs.5 is a promising biomimetic biomaterial that can be used for advanced orthopedic research and other applications. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available