4.1 Article

Spatial Sensitivity and Calibration of 10HS Soil Moisture Sensors in Converted Paddy Fields for Practical Use

Journal

JARQ-JAPAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages 299-310

Publisher

JAPAN INT RESEARCH CENTER AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

Keywords

bulk density; factory-supplied calibration function; hardpan layer; influence volume; near-saturated condition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study confirmed the utility of a capacitance sensor called 10HS in converted paddy fields, and proposed a corrected FSC function to determine its practical influence volume. The results showed that the actual influence volume of the sensor is smaller than previously reported, and it was suggested that the sensor should be installed at a specific height.
This study confirmed a utility of a 10HS sensor, a capacitance sensor, in converted paddy fields to exploit the practical influence volume from our results and the corrected FSC function. Converted paddy fields in Japan are typically used to cultivate lowland rice or upland crops, and many of them have a problem of poor drainage when upland crops are cultivated. One of the major causes of poor drainage is a presence of a hardpan layer due to soil puddling for lowland rice cultivation. To monitor soil moisture above the hardpan layer without the influence of the hardpan layer, we identified the spatial sensitivity around the sensor and determined the applicability of the sensor with the factory-supplied calibration (FSC) function, including under near-saturated conditions. As a result, regarding the spatial sensitivity, the influence volume of the sensor from our result is much smaller than that reported by Cobos (2008), and we suggested that the sensors should be installed at least 1.5 cm above the boundary between the hardpan and plowed layers. Moreover, regarding the calibrations of the sensors, a corrected FSC function that can account for the bulk density was proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available