Journal
AQUACULTURE
Volume 578, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.740140
Keywords
Live attenuated vaccine; Vaccine administration; Showering vaccination; Herpesviral hematopoietic necrosis; Cyprinid herpesvirus 2; Goldfish
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study aimed to explore alternative vaccination protocols for the P7-P8 strain in goldfish, by testing different dilutions and exposure times for dipping and showering vaccination. The results showed that the showering vaccination protocol, which uses small amounts of vaccine culture and requires short labor time, may be a suitable alternative to the standard bath method in goldfish aquaculture.
Herpesviral hematopoietic necrosis caused by cyprinid herpesvirus 2 (CyHV-2) frequently affects farmed goldfish Carassius auratus and gibel carp C. auratus gibelio, leading to significant economic damage. In our previous study, a live attenuated vaccine, called the P7-P8 vaccine strain, was developed by propagating virulent CyHV-2 in two non-natural host cell lines. The vaccine demonstrated high protective efficacy in goldfish with no signs of virulence reversion. Methods that reduce the costs of the procedure, including labor costs, are warranted for the practical application of this vaccine in goldfish aquaculture. The aim of this study was to explore alternative vaccination protocols for the P7-P8 strain in goldfish. First, we tested the previous standard administration protocol which is the bath vaccination with 1: 1000 diluted vaccine cultures for 2 h. In the simple first step to reduce vaccine virus culture, we examined the bathing protocol with more-diluted virus culture (ranging from 1: 1000 to 1: 81,000). The relative percentage survival (RPS) after the virulent virus immersion challenge for 2 h at 21 days post-vaccination was remarkably decreased in a dose-dependent manner; a dilution of 1: 3000 resulted in a 19% reduction from that used in the standard bathing protocol. Therefore, alternative methods (dipping and showering vaccination protocols) were tested using a 1: 100 dilution vaccine culture (10-fold more concentrated than the standard protocol) with short exposure times. Dipping vaccination for 10 s, 1 min, 2 min, and 5 min showed sufficient RPS of 82.4%-100%. The 10 s process was repeated six times using the same vaccine solution, resulting in an RPS >89%. In the showering vaccination protocol, the vaccine solution (1: 100 dilution; 1 mL, 3 mL, or 5 mL) was showered onto 20 goldfish on a net and held for 10 s, resulting in an RPS of >89%. We selected the showering vaccination as the suitable vaccination protocol. The effectiveness of this vaccination protocol was tested using the virus challenge by employing the cohabitation method with infected fish. The results showed high protective efficacy with an RPS of 65%-100%. This study demonstrated that the showering vaccination protocol, which uses small amounts of vaccine culture and produces less waste vaccine solution with short labor time, may be considered as a suitable alternative to the standard bath method in goldfish aquaculture.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available