4.7 Article

Explainable subgradient tree boosting for prescriptive analytics in operations management

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 312, Issue 3, Pages 1119-1133

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.08.037

Keywords

Decision support systems; Prescriptive analytics; Machine learning; Gradient boosting; Explainability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a explainable prescriptive analytics approach called subgradient tree boosting (STB) is proposed for solving convex stochastic optimization problems in operations management. The STB approach combines the method of subgradient descent in function space with sample average approximation and provides detailed explanations for the prescribed decisions, making it valuable in practice.
Motivated by the success of gradient boosting approaches in machine learning and driven by the need for explainable prescriptive analytics approaches in operations management (OM), we propose subgradient tree boosting (STB) as an explainable prescriptive analytics approach to solving convex stochastic optimization problems that frequently arise in OM. The STB approach combines the well-known method of subgradient descent in function space with sample average approximation, and prescribes decisions from a problem-specific loss function, historical demand observations, and prescriptive features. The approach provides a decision-maker with detailed explanations for the prescribed decisions, such as a breakdown of individual features' impact. These explanations are particularly valuable in practice when the decisionmaker has the discretion to adjust the recommendations made by a decision support system. We show how subgradients can be derived for common single-stage and two-stage stochastic optimization problems; demonstrate the STB approach's applicability to two real-world, complex capacity-planning problems in the service industry; benchmark the STB approach's performance against those of two prescriptive approaches-weighted sample average approximation (wSAA) and kernelized empirical risk minimization (kERM); and show how the STB approach's prescriptions can be explained by estimating the impact of individual features. The results suggest that the quality of the STB approach's prescriptions is comparable to that of wSAA's and kERM's prescriptions while also providing explanations. (c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available