4.6 Article

Deformation of soap bubbles in uniform magnetic fields

Journal

SOFT MATTER
Volume 19, Issue 43, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3sm00936j

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The deformation of hemispherical sessile bubbles made of ferrofluid soap under vertical uniform magnetic fields was studied. The meniscus was found to bear most of the deformation, reshaping into a cylinder, with the remainder of the bubble forming a spherical cap. A simple model was used to rationalize the growth of the meniscus height, showing that the meniscus shape depends on the competition between capillary, gravity and magnetic effects.
The deformation of hemispherical sessile bubbles made of ferrofluid soap under vertical uniform magnetic fields was studied using Helmholtz coils. The deformation and the shape of the bubbles were monitored according to the amplitude of the magnetic field, the initial volume of the bubbles and the ferrofluid volume used to create them. The meniscus was found to bear most of the deformation, reshaping into a cylinder, with the remainder of the bubble forming a spherical cap, mainly adapting to the meniscus transformation. The growth of the meniscus height was rationalised using a simple model. More precisely, the meniscus shape depends on the competition between capillary, gravity and magnetic effects. These three ingredients can be rewritten to highlight two characteristic lengths of the system: the capillary and the magnetic lengths. Depending on the magnetic field intensity, the shape of the meniscus is described by one of the two lengths, thus revealing the existence of two distinct regimes. A soap bubble in the shape of a hemisphere can be altered by an electric field. When subjected to a vertical and uniform magnetic field, hemispherical bubbles made of ferrofluid soap undergo deformation resulting in entirely distinct shapes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available