4.7 Article

Ni-based coating on 5083 aluminum alloy with Cu-Ni interlayer fabricated by ultra-high-speed laser directed energy deposition

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 474, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.130068

Keywords

Aluminum alloy; Laser energy deposition; Interlayer; Corrosion; Wear resistance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A high-performance composite protective coating was successfully prepared on the surface of 5083 aluminum alloy, exhibiting high wear resistance and corrosion resistance, through the innovative design of interlayer connection materials and the optimization of process parameters.
Through the innovative design of interlayer connection materials, a high-performance wear-resistant and corrosion-resistant composite protective coating was successfully prepared on the surface of 5083 aluminum alloy using ultra-high-speed (0.5 m/s) laser energy deposition technology. By conducting orthogonal experiments and analyzing the coating morphology and non-destructive testing results, the optimal process parameters for preparing the Cu-Ni25 alloy interlayer and nickel-based alloy surface protection layer were determined. The bond strength and friction resistance of the composite coating and the substrate were tested by shearing and scratch tests. Furthermore, the wear and corrosion resistance of the nickel-based alloy protective layer and substrate were comparatively assessed using an abrasive wear tester, electrochemical workstation, and salt spray test chamber. The results show that the Cu-Ni25 alloy interlayer plays a good bridge role and realizes metallurgical bonding with the aluminum alloy matrix. Additionally, the addition of the nickel-based alloy surface protection layer yields a significant improvement in deformation resistance, wear resistance, and seawater corrosion resistance compared to the aluminum alloy substrate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available