4.7 Article

Financial fragility, human resource management, and transition to renewable energy in Asian economies: a comparative analysis

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-30263-8

Keywords

Financial fragility; Human resource management; Renewable energy consumption; Asia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The high initial cost, financial fragility, and human resource management have significant impacts on renewable energy consumption. The study found that an increase in financial fragility significantly reduces renewable energy consumption, while human resources have a positive influence on renewable energy demand.
The main hurdle in deploying renewable energy projects is the high initial cost, making it difficult for businesses and individuals to afford it. The fragility of the financial sector and human resource management further slows the pace of renewable energy demand. Therefore, we aim to investigate the impact of financial fragility and human resource management on renewable energy consumption over time horizon 1997-2020. To that end, the analysis employed the ARDL-PMG model. For Asia as a whole and all other sub-regions, including South East Asia, East Asia, South Asia, and Western Asia, the estimates for bank non-performing loans are notably negative. In general, these findings imply that a rise in financial fragility significantly reduces renewable energy consumption in the long run. In the short run, the estimates attached to both bank non-performing loans and bank costs are negatively significant in Asia and sub-regions of Western Asia only. The results for the human resources show that it exerts a significant and positive influence on renewable energy demand in Asia as a whole, South Asia, East Asia, and Western Asia. The estimates attached to human resources are statistically insignificant in all models in the short run. In the end, some important public strategies and their implementations have been discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available