4.7 Article

Triaxial tests on anisotropic consolidated methane hydrate-bearing clayey-silty sediments of the South China Sea

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 284, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129260

Keywords

Triaxial tests; Mechanical behavior; Hydrate-bearing sediments; Anisotropic consolidation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted anisotropic consolidated shearing tests to investigate the mechanical properties of hydrate-bearing clayey-silty sediment. The stress-strain curves exhibited a strain-hardening trend and volumetric contraction. The increasing consolidation stress ratio and effective confining pressure led to higher failure strength, while the internal friction angle was proportional and cohesion was inversely proportional to the consolidation stress ratio.
Comprehensive mechanical investigations must be undertaken for hydrate-bearing clayey-silty sediment to ensure their long-term suitability and safety. Affected by the earth pressure and stress history, the stress state of hydrate-bearing clayey-silty sediment typically presents anisotropic. In this study, 12 anisotropic consolidated shearing tests were conducted, the results show that stress-strain curves exhibit a strain-hardening trend and volumetric contraction for isotropic consolidated hydrate-bearing sediments at the typical saturation (-30%) and pore porosity (-45%). The internal friction angle is proportional to the consolidation stress ratio, while the cohesion is inversely proportional to consolidation stress ratio. The increasing consolidation stress ratio and effective confining pressure lead to an increasing failure strength, mainly due to the higher stresses causing a tighter alignment of soil particles, limiting the free motion of the particles and the extension of cracks. The presence of the initial axial stress leads to an interparticle locking in the soil skeleton.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available