4.6 Review

Adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review of current landscape and future directions

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY
Volume 192, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104144

Keywords

Renal cell carcinoma; Adjuvant; Tyrosine kinase inhibitor; immune checkpoint; inhibitor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The introduction of TKIs and ICIs has greatly transformed the treatment of advanced RCC, though their efficacy after surgical resection remains controversial. Existing risk stratification methods and biomarkers are not accurate enough. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of key phase 3 RCTs, focusing on the use of TKIs, mTOR inhibitors, and ICIs for adjuvant RCC treatment.
The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been transformative for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Their efficacy post-surgical resection remains a contentious point. Various phase 3 RCTs have assessed their potency. Amongst evaluated agents, sunitinib and pembrolizumab have demonstrated notable disease-free survival benefits. Sunitinib's potential is diminished due to absence of clear overall survival (OS) benefits and side-effect profile. Pembrolizumab shows better tolerance, conclusive OS data are forthcoming. This scenario underscores the pressing need for advanced risk stratification methods and discovery of novel biomarkers. Existing strategies, largely pre-dating TKI and ICI therapeutic era, lack sufficient accuracy in predicting relapse-risk. Our review offers a comprehensive analysis of key phase 3 RCTs, focusing on TKIs, mTOR-inhibitors, and ICIs for adjuvant RCC treatment. The intent is to shed light on the intricate landscape of RCC treatment, guiding future research directions for optimizing patient outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available