4.4 Article

Rb2SiF6: Mn4+ and Rb2TiF6: Mn4+ Red-Emitting Phosphors

Journal

ECS JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages R206-R210

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0171612jss

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [26289085, 16K17506]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26289085, 16K17506] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rb-based hexafluoride red-emitting phosphors, Rb2SiF6:Mn4+ and Rb2TiF6:Mn4+, were synthesized by the coprecipitation method. Optical microscopy observation, X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurement, photoluminescence (PL) analysis, PL excitation (PLE) spectroscopy, and luminescence decay characteristics measurements were used to study the structural and optical properties of the phosphors. The photographs of the bulk samples showed clear crystallographic habits originating from the cubic and trigonal symmetries of the Rb2SiF6 and Rb2TiF6 hosts, respectively, in agreement with the XRD results. The phosphors exhibited an intense narrow-band Mn4+ (E-2(g) -> (4)A(2g)) red emission with internal quantum efficiencies higher than 90% upon blue light excitation. The Franck-Condon analysis of the PLE data yielded the Mn4+ intra-d-shell transitions to occur at similar to 2.47 eV (similar to 2.34 eV) for the (4)A(2g) -> T-4(2g) transition and at similar to 2.86 eV (similar to 2.83 eV) for the (4)A(2g) -> T-4(1g) transition in the Rb2SiF6:Mn4+ (Rb2TiF6:Mn4+) phosphor. Temperature dependence of the PL spectra from T = 20 to 500 K gave the quenching temperature values (T-q's) at which the PL intensity has fallen to half its maximum value to be T-q similar to 490 and similar to 450 K for Rb2SiF6:Mn4+ and Rb2TiF6:Mn4+, respectively, promising for use as high-temperature stable phosphors in solid-state lighting applications. (C) The Author(s) 2016. Published by ECS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available