3.8 Article

Removal Methods of Pesticides and Their Improvement Using Metal-Organic Frameworks

Journal

EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 66, Issue 13, Pages 39-75

Publisher

National Information & Documentation Centre-NIDOC
DOI: 10.21608/EJCHEM.2023.233038.8537

Keywords

pesticide; removal; biological; chemical; adsorption; MOFs sensor; extraction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the treatment methods for pesticide contamination and the advantages and disadvantages of using MOFs materials in wastewater remediation. It also introduces the application of MOFs in pesticide detection and removal.
The safety of the environment is a major global concern that has grabbed the attention of many researchers. Multiple variables can lead to food and water contamination. Pesticide is one of the hazardous variables that pollute water and affect negatively living organisms. Therefore, pesticide disposal is a big challenge. There are various treatment methods, such as biological, chemical, and physical methods used to remove pesticides. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are hybrid materials, which composed of organic and inorganic units. They are widely utilized for wastewater remediation. This review sheds light on the different types of pesticides and the various techniques used in removing pesticides including biological, chemical, and physical treatments. Furthermore, the definition and the most common stable MOFs are also discussed. Thus, the advantages and disadvantages of using MOFs in wastewater treatment are explained in this article. The synthetic procedure for the preparation of MOFs is illuminated in this review as well. Food safety has become a challenge. The applications of MOFs as sensors and as stationary phase extraction for the detection and removal of pesticides are intensively debated. Finally, this study gives insight on MOFs composites that utilized for pesticides removal and water purification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available