4.6 Article

Breaking azeotropes by reactive adsorption: A case for sorption-enhanced dimethyl carbonate synthesis

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 282, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2023.119326

Keywords

Azeotropic product mixture; CO2 utilization; Dimethyl Carbonate; Reactive adsorption; Steam separation enhancement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the direct production of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) from CO2 using sorption-enhanced DMC (SEDMC) synthesis. The SEDMC synthesis is shown to be an exemplary case for reactive separation, as it enhances the reaction and simplifies downstream processing. By incorporating in-situ water adsorption, SEDMC achieves significantly higher methanol conversions compared to other direct synthesis routes.
This work investigates the direct production of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) from CO2 by sorption-enhanced DMC (SEDMC) synthesis, employing modelling techniques. SEDMC synthesis is shown to be an exemplary case for reactive separation, as it enhances the reaction and simplifies downstream processing through in-situ separation. By incorporating in-situ water adsorption, SEDMC achieves significantly higher methanol conversions compared to other direct synthesis routes. Simultaneously, the formation of two azeotropes can be avoided, leading to a drastic simplification of downstream separation, requiring only one-step conventional distillation. By increasing the methanol conversion to 45%, the formation of a DMC-methanol azeotrope is prevented, and the in-situ water adsorption effectively avoids the DMC-water azeotrope. Based on these findings, further research should focus on identifying suitable materials and (reactive) adsorbents, while also incorporating a more detailed process layout and cycle design. These efforts will unlock the full potential of SEDMC synthesis in the production of renewable materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available