4.6 Article

Computational insights into novel benzenesulfonamide-1,3,4-thiadiazole hybrids as a possible VEGFR-2 inhibitor: design, synthesis and anticancer evaluation with molecular dynamics studies

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 47, Issue 44, Pages 20602-20618

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3nj04266a

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vascular endothelial growth factor VEGFR-2 has been identified as a potential target for anticancer agents. In this study, ten benzenesulfonamide-1,3,4-thiadiazole hybrids were synthesized and two compounds, 8c and 8e, exhibited potent inhibition against HepG-2 cells. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations confirmed their binding to VEGFR-2.
Vascular endothelial growth factor VEGFR-2 has been acknowledged as one of the possible targets for anticancer agents. Considering the pharmacophore features of sorafenib, ten benzenesulfonamide-1,3,4-thiadiazole hybrids 5a-d and 8a-e were synthesized via the cyclization reaction of hydrazine-1-carbodithioate 2 with a bundle of different hydrazonoyl chlorides 3a-d and 6a-e. The preliminary screening of their cytotoxic effect revealed potent inhibition of HepG-2 where 8c and 8e showed the best IC50 of 11.80 and 4.08 mu M, respectively, compared to 13.60 mu M of staurosporine. Their VEGFR-2 molecular docking simulations illustrated the crucial binding pattern with Glu917, Cys919, Glu885, Asp1046, and Lys868 for kinase inhibition with binding energy -7.90 and 8.40 kcal mol-1, respectively. Moreover, the molecular dynamics simulation of 8c and 8e revealed possible VEGFR-2 binding demonstrating MM-PBSA Delta Gbinding, -9.1 and -9.8 kcal mol-1, respectively. Additionally, 8c established 1 to 3 hydrophilic stable H-bonds, while 8e formed 1 to 2 H-bonds throughout the simulation. Thiadiazole benzenesulfonamide derivatives 8c and 8e showed the best HepG-2 IC50 of 11.80 and 4.08 mu M, respectively with corresponding VEGFR-2 Delta Gbinding, -9.1 and -9.8 kcal mol-1, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available