4.7 Article

Inhibiting aluminum oxidation in CuInAl precursor films: Significance for achieving high-performance Cu(InAl)Se2 solar cells

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
Volume 263, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2023.112564

Keywords

Cu(InAl)Se 2; Thin film solar cells; Selenization; Two-step fabrication; Aluminum oxidation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work demonstrates the effects of aluminum and aluminum oxide on the formation process of Cu(InAl)Se2 (CIASe) thin films. Through a series of experiments, the optimal conditions for obtaining excellent adhesion and electrical properties of CIASe thin films were identified. A 2.4 μm-thick CIASe thin film with strong adhesion to the Mo-coated substrate was successfully obtained, and a CIASe solar cell with an efficiency of 7.7% was fabricated. The study highlights the great potential of the two-step fabrication approach for CIASe thin film production.
In this work, we demonstrate the effects of aluminum and aluminum oxide within CuInAl precursor films on the formation process of Cu(InAl)Se2 (CIASe) thin films. We carried out a large number of experiments to optimize the conditions for obtaining CIASe thin films with excellent adhesion and electrical properties. Our findings suggest that the fabrication conditions of the precursor films, such as the vacuum level of sputtering chamber and the structure of the precursor films, significantly affect to the growth of the CIASe layer during selenization annealing. Through a series of experiments, we successfully obtained a 2.4 mu m-thick CIASe thin film with strong adhesion to the Mo-coated substrate and fabricated a CIASe solar cell with an efficiency of 7.7%. Our study demonstrates the great potential of the two-step fabrication approach for CIASe thin film production, and further improvements are expected by optimizing the fabrication conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available