4.7 Article

Chemical composition optimization of Al2O3-TiO2 composite coatings for enhanced wear and corrosion resistance

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 474, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.130053

Keywords

Chemical composition; Composite coating; Wear; Corrosion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study optimized the chemical composition of wear- and corrosion-resistant Al2O3-TiO2 composite coatings. The results showed that increasing TiO2 content increased coating thickness, and 2-layered structures had lower wear rates at low TiO2 content while 4-layered structures had higher wear resistance at high TiO2 content.
This study aimed to optimize the chemical composition of wear- and corrosion-resistant Al2O3-TiO2 composite coatings. 2-layered and 4-layered Al2O3-TiO2 coatings were fabricated on a 316L substrate with various Al2O3 and TiO2 content (20 %, 35 %, 50 %, 65 %, and 80 % in weight) at 900 degrees C by sol-gel technique. Wear properties were measured by dry sliding tests against an Al2O3 ball, and corrosion behavior was determined through potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests. All Al2O3-TiO2 composite coatings consisted of alpha-Al2O3 and rutile phases, regardless of the chemical composition. Increasing TiO2 content significantly increased coating thickness at the same number of layers. The 2-layered configurations resulted in lower wear rates in low-TiO2 compositions, whereas the 4-layered configurations provided higher wear resistance in high TiO2-containing coatings. The high Al2O3 concentration caused extremely high corrosion rates compared to those consisting of high TiO2. Wear and corrosion losses were decreased with increasing TiO2 content due to its nanosized structure, allowing well-adhered, continuous, and less porous coating morphology. The maximum improvement in wear and corrosion resistance was obtained in the 4-layered 65 % TiO2-containing composite coating.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available