4.6 Article

Drug levels of VEDOLIZUMAB in patients with pediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease in a real-life setting

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-05255-y

Keywords

Antibody; Children; Crohn's disease; Integrin; Ulcerative colitis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the trough levels of vedolizumab (VDZ) in a pediatric population with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in a real-life setting. The results showed that trough levels of VDZ were not associated with clinical remission or continuation of treatment, while a positive response on gut inflammation after induction predicted the need for maintenance therapy.
Vedolizumab (VDZ) is used off-label in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD). There are less data on drug levels to achieve and maintain remission in children. We aimed to study vedolizumab (VDZ) trough levels in a pediatric population in a real-life setting. We traced 50 patients with PIBD receiving VDZ treatment at our hospital, reviewed their treatment protocol, trough levels, and antidrug antibodies, and compared those to fecal calprotectin (FC) levels and achievement of corticosteroid-free maintenance therapy (CF). VDZ trough level was available from 198 samples during a median follow- up of 12.6 months. Proceeding to maintenance therapy was associated with a decline in FC but not with VDZ trough levels that were comparable between patients with FC < 100 mu g/g (remission), 100-1000 mu g/g, or > 1000 mu g/g at 3 months (mean levels of 36.8, 28.6, and 27 mu g/mL, respectively p = 0.188). At 3 months, patients achieving CF (41%) and those on corticosteroids had comparable VDZ trough levels (33 vs. 27.5 mu g/mL, respectively). At 6 months, the trough level was similar in groups with FC < 100 mu g/g or FC > 1000 mu g/g (31.5 and 27.6 mu g/mL, p = 0.859). Treatment intensification did not improve the achieved CF at 12 months. None developed drug antibodies nor discontinued the therapy for an adverse event.Conclusion: VDZ was a well-tolerated and safe biologic treatment. A positive response on gut inflammation after induction predicted proceeding to maintenance therapy whereas trough levels did not. A VDZ trough level associated with clinical remission or continuing with VDZ treatment could not be determined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available