4.3 Article

The effects of exercise modality and intensity on energy expenditure and cardiorespiratory response in adults with obesity and treated obstructive sleep apnoea

Journal

CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 342-351

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1479972316643699

Keywords

Energy expenditure; obstructive sleep apnoea; obesity; exercise; weight supported; weight unsupported

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
  2. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2010-11-002] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To inform recommendations for the exercise component of a healthy lifestyle intervention for adults with obesity and treated obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), we investigated the total energy expenditure (EE) and cardiorespiratory response to weight-supported (cycling) and unsupported (walking) exercise. Individuals with treated OSA and a body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m(2) performed an incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test on a cycle ergometer and a treadmill to determine the peak oxygen uptake ((V) over dotO(2pk)). Participants subsequently completed two endurance tests on each modality, matched at 80% and 60% of the highest (V) over dotO(2pk) determined by the incremental tests, to intolerance. The cardiorespiratory response was measured and total EE was estimated from the (V) over dotO(2). Sixteen participants completed all six tests: mean [SD] age 57 [13] years and median [IQ range] BMI 33.3 [30.8-35.3] kg/m(2). Total EE during treadmill walking was greater than cycling at both high (158 [101] vs. 29 [15] kcal; p < 0.001) and moderate (178 [100] vs. 85 [59] kcal; p = 0.002) intensities, respectively, with similar cardiorespiratory responses and pattern of EE during rest, exercise and recovery. Contrary to current guidelines, walking might be the preferred training modality to achieve the combination of weight loss and increased cardiorespiratory fitness in adults with obesity and treated OSA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available