4.3 Review

Reactive oxygen species within the vaginal space: An additional promoter of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and uterine cervical cancer development?

Journal

OPEN MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

DE GRUYTER POLAND SP Z O O
DOI: 10.1515/med-2023-0826

Keywords

cervical cancer; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; oxygen reduction; oxidative stress; vaginal microbiota

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In addition to HPV infection, complex molecular disturbances and chronic oxidative stress may contribute to the development of uterine cervical intraepithelial abnormalities and cancer. Reactive oxygen species and free radicals are potentially important factors for CIN and cancer development. This study summarized how these compounds can damage vulnerable metaplastic cervical epithelium, including DNA.
Uterine cervical intraepithelial abnormalities and cancer development may also depend upon biological problems that arise as a result of complex molecular disturbances within the vaginal space, in addition to the widely known causative effect of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Chronic oxidative stress is a consequence of oxygen reduction in the vaginal space. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and free radicals are yet unrecognizable causative agents and are probably very important factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer development. The intermediate compounds of oxygen reduction on these metabolic pathways are superoxide anion (O-2(-)), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxide ions (OH-), and hydroxyl radical (HO center dot). Considering these points, the aim of this work was to summarize how these compounds can damage all molecules, including DNA, of vulnerable metaplastic cervical epithelium. Finally, in some women with a poor immune defense system, ROS alone or accompanied by a high-risk HPV type may promote all levels of CIN and cancer development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available