4.7 Article

InitialGAN: A Language GAN With Completely Random Initialization

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2023.3315778

Keywords

Generative adversarial network (GAN); text generation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research tackles the exposure bias problem in text generative models and proposes two techniques to improve their performance. It introduces a new evaluation metric to assess the quality of generated samples and demonstrates that the proposed model outperforms traditional MLE methods without using any pretraining techniques.
Text generative models trained via maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) suffer from the notorious exposure bias problem, and generative adversarial networks (GANs) are shown to have potential to tackle this problem. The existing language GANs adopt estimators, such as REINFORCE or continuous relaxations to model word probabilities. The inherent limitations of such estimators lead current models to rely on pretraining techniques (MLE pretraining or pretrained embeddings). Representation modeling methods (RMMs), which are free from those limitations, however, are seldomly explored because of their poor performance in previous attempts. Our analyses reveal that invalid sampling methods and unhealthy gradients are the main contributors to such unsatisfactory performance. In this work, we present two techniques to tackle these problems: dropout sampling and fully normalized long short-term memory network (LSTM). Based on these two techniques, we propose InitialGAN whose parameters are randomly initialized in full. Besides, we introduce a new evaluation metric, least coverage rate (LCR), to better evaluate the quality of generated samples. The experimental results demonstrate that the InitialGAN outperforms both MLE and other compared models. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time a language GAN can outperform MLE without using any pretraining techniques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available