A comparison of micro-flocculation and ozonation as pretreatments for ultrafiltration: organic removal and membrane fouling

Micro-flocculation and ozone were applied as pretreatments of ultrafiltration to treat sodium alginate (SA) and humic acid (HA) simulated water, respectively, to investigate the effects of different pretreatments of ultrafiltration (UF) on filtration flux and removal of organic matters. Regarding the SA simulated water, micro-flocculation helped to improve the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal efficiency highly, maximum DOC removal efficiency reached to 79.77%, due to the rejection of gel layer introduced by the alginate-aluminum complexes, but the gel layer had a negative impact on membrane flux. Compared with micro-flocculation, ozone as pretreatments had better ability to enhance the membrane specific flux, the maximum final specific flux remained as 0.786, larger than that of MF-UF process (0.574). Ozonation oxidizing SA into small organic molecules significantly reduced membrane fouling and filtration resistance, but also produced some dissolved organic matters hindering DOC removal of effluent. As for HA simulated water, both the micro-flocculation and ozone could effectively improve the specific flux, the final specific flux of MF-UF and ozone-UF were about 0.930, but MF-UF exhibited better DOC removal than ozone-UF, which avoided the introduction of additional dissolved organic matters.

Automated summary

Micro-flocculation and ozone as pretreatments of ultrafiltration have significant effects on the removal of organic matters and membrane flux. Micro-flocculation improves DOC removal efficiency but negatively impacts membrane flux. Ozone pretreatment enhances membrane specific flux but introduces dissolved organic matters hindering DOC removal. Both micro-flocculation and ozone can improve specific flux for HA simulated water, but micro-flocculation exhibits better DOC removal by avoiding the introduction of additional organic matters.