4.7 Article

Usability of biomonitors in monitoring the change of tin concentration in the air

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-30277-2

Keywords

Heavy metal; Biomonitor; Tin; Sn; Duzce

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Air pollution, particularly heavy metal pollution, is a significant global issue that affects all forms of life. This study explores the use of trees as biomonitors for assessing long-term trends in heavy metal contamination, specifically tin (Sn) pollutants. The findings highlight the varying potentials of different tree species in monitoring and mitigating Sn pollution.
Air pollution, a pressing global issue, encompasses various harmful elements, with heavy metals being particularly significant pollutants affecting all forms of life. Effective monitoring and regulation of heavy metal concentrations, especially in the atmosphere, is pivotal. Employing trees as biomonitors emerges as a potent tool, particularly in retrospectively assessing long-term heavy metal contamination trends. This study aims to furnish insights into both tin (Sn) pollutants and the most suitable species for monitoring and mitigating such pollution. Within this study's ambit, samples were collected from Pinus pinaster, Cupressus arizonica, Picea orientalis, Cedrus atlantica, and Pseudotsuga menziesii species in Duzce Province. This area, ranked as the fourth-most air-polluted in Europe according to the World Air Pollution Report, was examined to discern changes in Sn concentration across species, organs, orientations, and age groups over the last four decades. The findings revealed varying potentials for Sn accumulation among the species. Specifically, Pinus pinaster and Picea orientalis were identified as suitable species for monitoring Sn pollution, while Cupressus arizonica, Cedrus atlantica, and Pseudotsuga menziesii exhibited potential for reducing Sn pollution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available