3.8 Review

Going Beyond Conventional Assessment of Developmental Motor Disorders: Exploring Video Methods for Early Identification Among Children 0 to 3 Years

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/27536351231207740

Keywords

Motor skills; neurodevelopmental disorder; developmental motor disorder; video capture; early intervention

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motor skills and movement-related functioning play a significant role in children's experience and interaction with the world. Early and accurate identification of developmental motor disorders is crucial in minimizing their long-term effects and enabling timely access to therapeutic interventions. While traditional motor assessments only capture a snapshot of a child's motor skills, video-capture methods like the General Movements Assessment and the Infant Motor Profile offer more accuracy and predictive power.
Motor skills and movement-related functioning significantly shape how children experience and interact with the world around them. Among infants and young children, developmental motor disorders contribute to delays with motor, cognitive, and psychosocial development. Early and accurate identification of these disorders is necessary to facilitate timely access to therapeutic interventions that minimize the long-term effects of disability on everyday activities and participation. In the United States, motor assessments commonly used among children 0 to 3 years focus on completion of specific motor skills at a single point in time, which provides only a part of the greater picture that is a child's motor and movement-related functioning. Video-capture methods, like the General Movements Assessment (GMA) and the Infant Motor Profile (IMP), offer greater accuracy and predictive power to (1) identify motor deficits in young children and (2) facilitate early access to supportive, therapeutic intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available