4.5 Article

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Evacuation of Retained Hemothorax; Timing May Not Increase Thoracoscopic Failure

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 293, Issue -, Pages 168-174

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.07.037

Keywords

Hemothorax; Trauma; Trauma surgery; VATS; Video-assisted thoracic surgery

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current guidelines recommend video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) within 4 days for retained hemothorax in trauma patients, but these recommendations are based on small observational studies. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the timing of VATS and clinical outcomes in retained hemothorax. The results showed that delaying VATS was associated with increased hospital length of stay and other secondary outcomes. However, the clinical significance of these increases was less dramatic compared to other studies, suggesting that the urgency of evacuation may not be as high. Additionally, there was no association found between the timing of VATS and mortality or the need for additional procedures. Therefore, in the appropriate clinical context, the evacuation of retained hemothorax through VATS can be delayed if clinically necessary, without an associated increase in mortality or the requirement for additional procedures.
Introduction: Current guidelines for retained hemothorax (rHTX) in trauma patients recommend video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) within 4 days. However, this recommendation is currently based upon evidence from small observational studies. The aim of this study is to further evaluate the association between timing of VATS and clinical outcomes in rHTX following trauma.Methods: Using the 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database, adult (>= 15 years-old) trauma patients with rHTX who underwent evacuation of rHTX through VATS were included. Multivariable linear and logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between the timing of VATS and clinical outcomes. Postponing/delaying evacu-ation through VATS was defined in our analysis as performing the surgery 1 day later in time.Results: 793 patients were included. VATS was performed at a median 4.5 days (Inter -quartile range = 2.4, 8.4). A 1.17 day increase in hospital length of stay (P = <0.001), a 0.17 day increase in postoperative hospital length of stay (P = 0.007), a 0.48 day increase in ventilation days (P = <0.001), and a 0.66 day increase in intensive care unit length of stay (P = <0.001) was found for each day that VATS was delayed. Additionally, a 1.10 odds ratio for infectious complications (P = <0.001) and a 0.96 odds ratio for discharge to home (P = 0.006) was seen for each day VATS was delayed. There was no significant association between the timing of VATS failure of VATS (defined as requiring additional procedures such as a secondary VATS or progressed to thoracotomy after initial VATS) and mortality (P > 0.05).Conclusions: While delaying VATS was statistically associated with increased hospital length of stay, and other secondary outcomes, the clinical significance of the increase in these variables were less dramatic compared to the results of other studies, thus tempering the urgency of evacuation. Additionally, there was no association found between the timing of VATS and mortality, discharge disposition, or the need for additional VATS and/ or thoracotomy. Therefore, in the appropriate clinical context, the evacuation of rHTX through VATS can be delayed if clinically necessary, without an associated increase in mortality or the requirement for additional procedures.(c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available