4.7 Article

Concentrations and legislative aspects of PBDEs in plastic of waste electrical and electronic equipment in Brazil

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 906, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167349

Keywords

Polybrominated diphenyl ethers; Persistent organic pollutants; Flame retardants; WEEE; Circular economy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brominated flame retardants (BFRs), widely used in polymeric products like electronic equipment, have been banned in many countries due to their adverse health impacts and environmental persistence. However, research on the presence of these contaminants, particularly in waste electronic equipment, is limited in Brazil. This study detected polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in waste EEE samples in the metropolitan region of Sorocaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Brominated flame retardants (BFRs) have been widely used as additives in polymeric products such as electronic and electrical equipment (EEE) to help meet fire safety regulations. However, some BFRs like polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), are now listed under the Stockholm Convention on persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and banned in many countries, due to their adverse health impacts, environmental persistence, and capacity for bioaccumulation and long-range atmospheric transport. Despite this, in Brazil, only a few studies exist of the presence of these contaminants in the environment, and even fewer in waste EEE (WEEE). Against this backdrop, this study measured the presence of PBDEs in samples (n = 159) of WEEE in the metropolitan region of Sorocaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil. PBDEs were detected in 149 samples, with concentrations in 18 samples exceeding the Eu-ropean Union's Low POP Content Limit (LPCL) of 1000 mg/kg. Decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) was the congener present at the highest concentration in most samples, with those of other PBDEs such as BDE-47 much

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available