4.6 Article

Physicochemical and morphological properties of size-controlled chitosan-tripolyphosphate nanoparticles

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.10.040

Keywords

Chitosan nanoparticles; Ionic crosslinking; Ionic strength; Particle size; Morphology; Ultra-sonication

Funding

  1. National 863 Program [2011BAD23B02, 2013AA102207]
  2. NSFC [31171686, 30901000]
  3. 111 project [B07029, PCSIRT0627]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chitosan-tripolyphosphate nanoparticles have been extensively studied during the last decade because of their numerous applications. In this study, we describe conditions to optimize chitosan nanoparticles as potential nano-fillers in edible films. The ionic cross-linking between the cationic amino groups on the chitosan (CS) chain and the anionic phosphate groups of sodium tripolyphosphate (TPP) was verified via FTIR. Particle size, polydispersity index (PDI) and surface zeta-potential were controlled by chitosan's Mw and concentration, CS: TPP mass ratio, and external conditions such as pH and salinity of the initial chitosan solution. Post-processing methods such as centrifugation and ultra-sonication were used to further control particle size. We show that particle size can be controlled by selecting appropriate conditions. Particles with sizes below 120 nm were produced at different CS: TPP mass ratios depending on the CS concentration. Dilute NaCl was the optimal solution ionic composition that decreased the size by 25% and also resulted in a narrow particle size distribution. We show using UV-vis spectrophotometry that particles of different size, separated by centrifugation had different phosphorus content. Ultra-sonication can be used to reduce the size by 50% but long time caused fragmentation of the nanoparticles. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed the differences in the morphology of chitosan nanoparticles under various fabrication conditions. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available