4.7 Article

Managing stability of aerobic granules by coordinating diameter and denitrification

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 906, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167795

Keywords

Aerobic granules; Denitrification; Settling; Clarification; Diameter

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the relationships between granule stability, diameter, biomass retention capacity, and denitrification efficiency in Aerobic Granular Sludge (AGS) technology. The results indicate that granule diameter is not a reliable indicator of stability or biomass retention capacity. Promoting simultaneous nitrification and denitrification is found to improve granule stability. Ensuring coordination between diameter and denitrification control is crucial for AGS stability.
Aerobic Granular Sludge (AGS) technology is a promising solution for wastewater treatment due to its structure and high biomass retention capacity. However, the stability of AGS is still a challenge for widespread use. This study investigated the relationships among granule stability, granule diameter, biomass retention capacity, and denitrification efficiency. The results showed that granule diameter did not necessarily indicate granule stability, nor was it associated with biomass retention capacity. For mature granules, promoting simultaneous nitrification and denitrification rather than anoxic denitrification was found to improve granule stability. The deterioration of clarification capacity caused by increased anoxic denitrification at high nitrate concentration was not indicated by diameters or the commonly used SVI5/SVI30. Therefore, ensuring coordination between diameter and denitrification control is crucial for the stability of AGS. These results provide a basis for further research and development of efficient and user-friendly methods for monitoring granular stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available