4.8 Article

Robust Degradation State Identification in the Presence of Parameter Uncertainty and Outliers

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2023.3296896

Keywords

Degradation; Measurement errors; Hidden Markov models; Analytical models; Uncertainty; Measurement uncertainty; Uncertain systems; Degradation analysis; distributionally robust optimization; measurement outlier; parameter uncertainty; prognostic and health management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Degradation analysis is crucial for system health management and remaining useful life prediction. This study proposes a framework for degradation state estimation based on distributionally robust optimization, which addresses the challenges of parameter uncertainty and measurement outlier, leading to more accurate evaluation of health status.
Degradation analysis is essential in system health management and remaining useful life prediction. Since the observed degradation data are inevitably contaminated by measurement error, degradation state estimation is hence important for a more accurate evaluation of the health status. There are two challenges for estimating the degradation state. The first is the uncertainty associated with the estimated parameters for the model, and the other is the measurement outlier. Current models usually assume Gaussian measurement errors and they are sensitive to the measurement outlier. To deal with these two challenges, we develop a framework for degradation state estimation under the context of the distributionally robust optimization, which is robust to the parameter uncertainty. We further incorporate the Huber loss into this framework to make it robust to the measurement outlier. A procedure for estimation of the model parameters as well as setting the parameters of the ambiguity set is provided. The effectiveness of the model is validated using numerical and real case studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available