4.6 Article

Facile preparation of oxine functionalized magnetic Fe3O4 particles for enhanced uranium (VI) adsorption

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.11.020

Keywords

Uranium (VI); Magnetic oxine; Adsorption; Kinetics; Thermodynamics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21353003]
  2. Special Innovation Talents of Harbin Science and Technology [2013RFQXJ145]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds of the Central University (HEUCFZ)
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [B201316]
  5. Program of International S&T Cooperation special project [2013DFR500060]
  6. Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements of Harbin [2013DB4BG011]
  7. Research and Development of Industrial Technology Project of Jilin Province [JF2012C022-4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a study of uranium (VI) adsorption in aqueous solutions by magnetic oxine (ferroferric oxide/oxine composite). Batch experiments of uranium (VI) adsorption were conducted, investigating the significance of solution pH, contact time, ionic strength, and temperature on uranium sorption efficiency. The results suggest that maximum adsorption capacity is 125 mg g(-1) when the initial uranium (VI) concentration is 50 mg L-1 at 298 K, displaying a mass transport property of the magnetic oxine for the removal of uranium (VI). The sorption was strongly dependent on pH and independent of ionic strength, indicating that the sorption was mainly dominated by inner-sphere surface complexation. The experimental data are analyzed using sorption kinetic models, revealing that the process follows a pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The thermodynamic parameters show that the process is endothermic and spontaneous. We demonstrate a fast, efficient and convenient material for the removal of uranium (VI) from aqueous solutions. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available