4.7 Article

Regular polyhedron α-Fe2O3 nanocrystals prepared from hot rolled sludge for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants: Optimization and mechanism

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 430, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2023.119038

Keywords

Hot rolled sludge; alpha-Fe2O3 nanoparticles; Preparation mechanism; Photocatalytic degradation; Density functional theory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A photocatalyst with the micromorphology of regular polyhedron (RP-alpha-Fe2O3 nanocrystals) was prepared using hot rolled sludge (HRS). The RP-alpha-Fe2O3 nanocrystals exhibited strong visible light absorption and excellent catalytic performance, degrading Rhodamine B solution with high efficiency and displaying good reusability and stability.
Herein, a photocatalyst with the micromorphology of regular polyhedron (RP-alpha-Fe2O3 nanocrystals) was prepared via hot rolled sludge (HRS), and its preparation mechanism was investigated. The optical property test and DFT calculations exhibited the RP-alpha-Fe2O3 nanocrystals has strong visible light absorption and small electrochemical impedance, which indicated that it has excellent catalytic performance under visible light. The degradation efficiency of 100 mg/L Rhodamine B (RhB) solution could reach 99.2% within 60 min. Furthermore, the RP-alpha-Fe2O3 nanocrystals exhibited excellent reusability and stability. Meanwhile, hydroxyl radicals (center dot OH), superoxide radicals (center dot O-2(-)) and photogenerated holes (h(+)) were the most significant active substances that affect the photocatalytic efficiency, due to they would synergically degrade RhB in the photocatalytic reaction system. Particularly, the diffraction peak of N1s was detected in the RP-alpha-Fe2O3 nanocrystals after reaction, and the intensity of C-O and C=O peaks increased, which proved that the photocatalyst has adsorption for RhB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available