3.8 Proceedings Paper

Performance Assessment of DECT-2020 NR and Classic DECT Coexistence Mechanisms

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/VTC2023-Spring57618.2023.10200362

Keywords

DECT-2020; New Radio; IoT; coexistence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recently standardized ETSI DECT-2020 NR technology is expected to enable operator-independent IoT services. Through system-level simulation, this paper evaluates coexistence solutions for DECT-2020 and classic DECT systems, showing that standard listen-before-talk access ensures excellent performance while last-minute scan leads to significant degradation in DECT-2020 performance.
The recently standardized ETSI DECT-2020 New Radio (NR) technology promises to enable operator-independent Internet-of-Things (IoT) services. One of the supported operating bands is the 1880 - 1900 MHz band where IoT devices use one or more 1.728 MHz wide channels for multi-hop communications. It has been shown that such systems scale well to satisfy the requirements of 5G massive machine-type communications (mMTC). During the standardization process, the coexistence with classic DECT technology was addressed but the benefits of different options have not been deeply explored. In this paper, by utilizing system-level simulation techniques we evaluate several coexistence solutions for DECT-2020 and classic DECT systems including conventional listen-before-talk access (LBT), last-minute scan, and scheduling-based mechanisms. Our numerical results illustrate that the standard LBT operation ensures excellent performance with no more than 2% of packet drops for classic DECT, and still results in satisfactory DECT-2020 operation under 25% of resources allocated to classic DECT. The use of last-minute-scan leads to drastic performance degradation of DECT-2020 (by more than 10% in terms of packet drops) as compared to the standard LBT-only operation. Finally, a scheduling-based mechanism allows to improve the LBT performance for DECT-2020 devices by 2-5%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available