4.7 Article

Heterogenous distribution and burial flux of black carbon in Chinese lakes and its global implication

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 906, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167687

Keywords

Black carbon; Chinese lakes; Burial flux; Carbon isotope; Radiocarbon age

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Black carbon (BC) plays a crucial role in global carbon cycle and climate change. The source of BC and its burial flux in environments were investigated in this study using surface sediments from 22 Chinese lakes. The results indicate that fossil fuel combustion is the primary contributor to BC, with the highest contribution in developed Eastern China and the lowest contribution in the rural Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. The BC burial flux in Chinese lakes is estimated to be 126.4 +/- 15.8 Gg year-1, and approximately 2987 +/- 1022 Gg year-1 in global lakes.
Black carbon (BC) plays a crucial role in global carbon cycle and climate change. However, its source and burial flux in environments are not well constrained. Here, we investigated surface sediments from 22 Chinese lakes across wide geographical areas and different socioeconomic status. The BC content accounts for 0.09-10.5 % of total organic carbon (TOC), and its average 14C age is older than that of TOC by 1640 years. The application of delta 13C-based MixSIAR model shows that the contribution of fossil fuel combustion is highest in the most developed Eastern China (85.7 %) and lowest in the rural Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (51.4 %), which is corroborated by the results from 14C-based two endmember mixing model. The BC data from this study and literatures suggest that the current BC burial flux is 126.4 +/- 15.8 Gg year-1 in Chinese lakes, and approximately 2987 +/- 1022 Gg year-1 in global lakes. Globally, lakes accumulate 1.2 %-6.4 % of the total BC production and thus are an important and heterogenous BC sink.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available