4.7 Article

Assessing Li accommodation at amorphous ZrO2 grain boundaries

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
Volume 588, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154780

Keywords

ZrO2 Brouwer Diagram; lithium accelerated corrosion; Lithium solubility in ZrO2; Complex grain boundaries amorphous zirconia; Zirconia defect concentration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of lithium in the coolant of nuclear reactors without boron has been found to accelerate the corrosion of zirconium alloys. Atomistic simulations have predicted a high solubility of lithium in amorphous structures, which could offer a mechanism for the observed lithium-accelerated corrosion of Zr-based alloys.
Nuclear Pressurised Water Reactors (PWRs) use zirconium alloys as a fuel cladding, preventing the cooling water, at elevated pH using lithium hydroxide, from interacting with the fuel. Boron, as boric acid, is added to the coolant as a reactivity shim. Future reactor designs are considering removing soluble boron reactivity control to aid plant simplification. The presence of lithium in the absence of boron in the coolant has, however, been found to accelerate the corrosion of zirconium-based alloys under certain conditions and the mechanisms by which this occurs is under investigation. The ingress of lithium into the bulk oxide layer of zirconium alloy has been addressed in a previous study and was found to be unlikely. Here, atomistic simulations were used to produce Brouwer diagrams from which the solubility of lithium in amorphous structures representing complex grain boundaries have been predicted. The solubility of lithium in these amorphous structures is predicted to be high and will produce an elevated concentration of oxygen defects within the amorphous structure. This could offer a mode for transport of oxygen to the metal oxide interface and, potentially, offer a mechanism or part of a mechanism for observed lithium-accelerated corrosion of Zr-based alloys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available