4.7 Article

Multi-omics integration strategy in the post-mortem interval of forensic science

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 268, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2023.125249

Keywords

Machine learning; Multi-omics; Post-mortem interval; Stacking algorithm

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study proposes an innovative method that combines multi-omics and artificial intelligence to infer the post-mortem interval. By integrating multiple molecular markers and various information, it improves the accuracy of PMI prediction.
Estimates of post-mortem interval (PMI), which often serve as pivotal evidence in forensic contexts, are fundamentally based on assessments of variability among diverse molecular markers (including proteins and metabolites), their correlations, and their temporal changes in post-mortem organisms. Nevertheless, the present approach to estimating the PMI is not comprehensive and exhibits poor performance. We developed an innovative approach that integrates multi-omics and artificial intelligence, using multimolecular, multimarker, and multidimensional information to accurately describe the intricate biological processes that occur after death, ultimately enabling inference of the PMI. Called the multi-omics stacking model (MOSM), it combines metabolomics, protein microarray electrophoresis, and fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy data. It shows improved prediction accuracy of the PMI, which is urgently needed in the forensic field. It achieved an accuracy of 0.93, generalized area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.98, and minimum mean absolute error of 0.07. The MOSM integration framework not only considers multiple markers but also incorporates machine-learning models with distinct algorithmic principles. The diversity of biological mechanisms and algorithmic models further ensures the generalizability and robustness of PMI estimation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available