4.6 Article

Preparation of chitosan-TPP nanoparticles using microengineered membranes - Effect of parameters and encapsulation of tacrine

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.04.006

Keywords

Chitosan nanoparticles; Ionic gelation; Membrane emulsification; Membrane contactor; Tacrine; Alzheimer's disease

Funding

  1. Campus France (France) [793117D]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chitosan nanoparticles were prepared by a novel technique based on ionic gelation using sodium tripolyphosphate (TPP) as cross-linking agent. In this method, the TPP solution flows through the pores of a microengineered membrane into the chitosan solution put in a stirred cell. It is shown that favorable micromixing conditions are created on top of the membrane surface to form chitosan-TPP nanoparticles. The influence of several formulation parameters (chitosan and TPP concentrations, ratio between volumes of the two solutions, pH of the two solutions, chitosan molecular weight) and process parameters (membrane characteristics, injection speed, stirring rate) were investigated. Under optimum conditions, chitosan-TPP nanoparticles had a mean size around 90-100 nm, polydispersity index around 0.22, and zeta potential close to + 31 mV. The encapsulation of the anti-Alzheimer's drug tacrine did not change the mean size and polydispersity index of unloaded nanoparticles, whereas the zeta potential was increased to + 38mV due to the positively charge of tacrine. Under optimum conditions, tacrine encapsulation efficiency into nanoparticles was found equal to 66.1%. In addition, chitosan-TPP nanoparticles were shown to be stable at least during 25 days in an acidic medium at 4 or 25 degrees C. This study demonstrates that ionic gelation using a stirred cell with microengineered membrane is a suitable technique for preparation of chitosan-TPP nanoparticles. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available