4.4 Article

Plain Language vs Standard Format for Youth Understanding of COVID-19 Recommendations A Randomized Clinical Trial

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Improving grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation evidence tables part 4: a three-arm noninferiority randomized trial demonstrates improved understanding of content in summary of findings tables with a new format

Rebecca L. Morgan et al.

Summary: This study evaluated different formats of summary of findings (SoF) tables for single comparison with multiple outcomes. The alternative GRADE SoF table was found to be superior in terms of understanding, accessibility, satisfaction, and preference compared to the current GRADE SoF table and the adapted EPC SoF table. Participants reported increased satisfaction when SoF tables included information such as number needed to treat (NNT), anticipated absolute effect differences, and narrative syntheses. The alternative GRADE SoF table format was preferred by participants.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

Knowledge mobilization activities to support decision-making by youth, parents, and adults using a systematic and living map of evidence and recommendations on COVID-19: protocol for three randomized controlled trials and qualitative user-experience studies

Rana Charide et al.

Summary: This study aims to evaluate and compare the public's understanding and preference for different presentations of COVID-19 health recommendations. The study will involve online surveys and virtual interviews. The findings will provide guidance for improving the delivery of health recommendations.

TRIALS (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Focus groups and interviews with the public led to the development of a template for a GRADE Plain Language Recommendation (PLR)

Nancy Santesso et al.

Summary: The study developed a template for Plain Language Recommendations through focus groups and user tests, identifying key themes related to personalized information, recommendation strength, support services, information credibility, and formatting. This template can facilitate communication of guideline information to patients and the public, with potential impact on understanding and behavior change.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports: The CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 Extension

Nancy J. Butcher et al.

Summary: It is important to develop specific and harmonized guidance for reporting outcomes in clinical trials to reduce deficient reporting practices and ensure transparency and replicability.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2022)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

A multistakeholder development process to prioritize and translate COVID-19 health recommendations for patients, caregivers and the public. A case study of the COVID-19 recommendation map

Kevin Pottie et al.

Summary: This study aims to develop a digital communication tool to improve the implementation of COVID-19 recommendations. The study involves multi-stakeholder engagement and provides three plain language recommendation formats. The results indicate that this approach is effective in enhancing guideline communication and understanding.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Getting trustworthy guidelines into the hands of decision-makers and supporting their consideration of contextual factors for implementation globally: recommendation mapping of COVID-19 guidelines

Tamara Lotfi et al.

Summary: Published research on COVID-19 is rapidly increasing and being integrated into guidelines, with the trustworthiness of guidelines depending on various factors such as methods used to evaluate evidence. A global consortium has created a living project, the COVID19 map of recommendations, providing structured access to high quality guidance in the field. The map allows stakeholders to access and adapt evidence-informed recommendations, filling the long-standing need for decision-makers, guideline developers, and the public.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

GRADE EVIDENCE TO DECISION (ETD) FRAMEWORK FOR COVERAGE DECISIONS

Elena Parmelli et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE (2017)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Improving GRADE evidence tables part 1: a randomized trial shows improved understanding of content in summary of findings tables with a new format

Alonso Carrasco-Labra et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Dissemination of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Content Analysis of Patient Versions

Nancy Santesso et al.

MEDICAL DECISION MAKING (2016)

Article Communication

Testing Advice Response Theory in Interactions With Friends

Erina L. MacGeorge et al.

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH (2016)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Blinded interpretation of study results can feasibly and effectively diminish interpretation bias

Teppo L. N. Jarvinen et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2014)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information

Sarah E. Rosenbaum et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Presenting the Results of Cochrane Systematic Reviews to a Consumer Audience: A Qualitative Study

Claire Glenton et al.

MEDICAL DECISION MAKING (2010)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

Kenneth F. Schulz et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2010)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Methodological Challenges in Online Trials

Elizabeth Murray et al.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH (2009)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

Allison Tong et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE (2007)

Article Psychology, Mathematical

G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

Franz Faul et al.

BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2007)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Words matter: increasing the implementation of clinical guidelines

S Michie et al.

QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE (2005)