4.7 Article

Revealing the intrinsic nature of Ni-, Mn-, and Y-doped CeO2 catalysts with positive, additive, and negative effects on CO oxidation using operando DRIFTS-MS

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume 52, Issue 45, Pages 16911-16919

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3dt03001f

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, CeO2 doped with Ni, Mn, and Y catalysts were used to investigate the effect of doping on CO oxidation. The results showed that doping with Ni and Mn had a positive effect on activity, while doping with Y had a negative effect. The effects of different dopants were found to be additive. Surface factors obtained from operando DRIFTS-MS analysis and structure factors from XPS and Raman analyses were strongly correlated with CO oxidation reactivities.
The catalytic activity of a transition metal (host) oxide can be influenced by doping with a second cation (dopant), but the key factors dominating the activity of the doped catalyst are still controversial. Herein, CeO2 doped with Ni, Mn, and Y catalysts prepared using aerosol pyrolysis were used to demonstrate the positive, negative, and additive effects on CO oxidation as a model reaction. Various characterization results indicated that Ni, Mn, and Y had been successfully doped into the CeO2 lattice. The catalytic activities of each catalyst for CO conversion were in the order of Ni-CeO2 > Mn-CeO2 > CeO2 > Y-CeO2. Operando DRIFTS-MS and various characterization methods were applied to reveal the intrinsic nature of the doping effects. The accumulation rate of the surface bidentate carbonates determined the CO oxidation. A definition to evaluate the doping effect was proposed, which is anticipated to be useful for developing a rational catalyst with a high CO oxidation activity. The CO oxidation reactivities displayed strong correlations with the surface factors obtained from operando DRIFTS-MS analysis and the structure factors from XPS and Raman analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available