4.5 Article

Experimental studies on thermal conductivity of metal oxides/ water-ethylene glycol (50%-50%) nanofluids with varying temperature and concentration using ultrasonic interferometer

Journal

PHYSICA B-CONDENSED MATTER
Volume 670, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2023.415376

Keywords

Brownian motion; Adhesive forces; Thermal conductivity; Bridgman's equation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thermal conductivity of nanofluid was measured using an ultrasonic interferometer and Bridgman's equation. The study found that the thermal conductivity of nanofluid is dependent on the base fluid, with the highest conductivity observed in equal proportions of water and ethylene glycol. Measurements were taken at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.2% within a temperature range of 30℃ to 80℃. The thermal conductivity of the prepared nanofluids showed a significant increase compared to previous research, suggesting their potential use in heat transfer systems.
The thermal conductivity of nanofluid has been measured using an ultrasonic interferometer with the help of Bridgman's equation. Due to the strong dependency of the thermal conductivity of nanofluid on base fluid, we have taken different combinations of water and ethylene glycol. An equal proportion of both fluids gives the highest thermal conductivity. The thermal conductivity of nanofluid with concentrations of 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.2% have been measured within the temperature range of 30OC to 80OC. Measured thermal conductivity of the prepared nanofluids is increased up to 288% (CuO), 272% (MgO), and 234% (Fe2O3) and found better increment in comparison to the results reported by earlier researchers. Observed increment in the thermal conductivity of metal oxide nanofluids can be explained on the basis of static and dynamic parameters of the nanofluid. The high thermal conductivity of such nanofluids suggests it as a potential candidate for systems where heat transfer is required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available