4.7 Article

Quantitative 3D characterization of chromite ore particles

Journal

MINERALS ENGINEERING
Volume 204, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108403

Keywords

Computed tomography; Minerals engineering; Raw materials; X-ray imaging; Processing; MSPaCMAn

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main techniques currently used for characterizing raw materials are bulk or 2D methods, and there is a lack of standardized and automated methods for 3D characterization of particulate materials. In this study, X-ray computed tomography was used to characterize crushed chromite ore with nine particle size classes below 1 mm. The workflow showed consistent accuracy and can be automated with limited user input. It offers potential advantages over traditional 3D image processing methods in terms of automation, accuracy, and standardization.
The main techniques used to characterize raw materials are currently bulk or 2D. This is a consequence of the current lack of standardized and automated methods to characterize particulate materials in 3D. Here, we apply a workflow to characterize a crushed chromite ore with nine particle size classes below 1 mm using X-ray computed tomography. All data processing of all samples follows the same sequence of steps, which means that the analysis can be automated with limited user input as opposed to traditional 3D image processing methods that require user input specific to each particle size fraction. Results of chromite composition, particle size distribution and chromite liberation are obtained for individual particles and compared with the results from xray diffraction and 2D-based automated mineralogy. The results shows a consistent accuracy across all size classes down to 75 mu m. For the larger particle sizes (>600 mu m) the chromite liberation curves are more consistent than those obtained from 2D-based automated mineralogy, possibly due to the stereological bias of 2D sections. The particle size distributions is the property for which the 2D bias causes a larger divergence from 3D results across all particle sizes. In conclusion, the workflow is more automatable (thus, faster and cheaper) and less bias (thus, more accurate and standardisable) than other 3D image analysis methods. Additionally, it stands as complementary to established techniques for particle-based characterization, especially to measure particle properties that 2D-based methods may not measure representatively for larger particle sizes and when sampling is limited. Further testing of the workflow in progressively more complex materials is necessary, but its potential to transform the way mineral particulate materials are characterized is demonstrated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available