4.7 Article

Heterostructured YFeO3/CeO2 as efficient photoelectrode for photoelectrochemical degradation of organic pollutants under visible light irradiation

Journal

JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104394

Keywords

YFeO3; CeO2; Heterojunction; Photoelectrocatalysis; Wastewater treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A YFeO3/CeO2 catalyst with small crystal size, porous structure, and YFeO3/CeO2 heterojunction was prepared using the sol-gel method. This catalyst can effectively separate the photogenerated electron-hole pairs and improve the degradation efficiency.
A YFeO3/CeO2 catalyst is developed using a sol-gel procedure to overcome the recombination of photogenerated electron-hole pairs, which limits its degradation efficiency. The YFeO3/CeO2 catalyst is characterized by two distinct orthorhombic YFeO3 and CeO2 phases, with the size of YFeO3 crystal smaller than that of its parent phase. YFeO3/CeO2 with a higher CeO2 content (YC-30) reveals not only a porous morphology and hydrophilicity, but also a reduced energy bandgap (1.74 eV) that is lower than that of either single YFeO3 (1.90 eV) or CeO2 (2.86 eV). In the photocatalysis assessment of the YC-30 electrode, a high photocurrent density of up to 156.3 mu A cm-2 at 1.4 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) under simulated sun irradiation is achieved. Furthermore, the YC-30 electrode achieves a favorable photoelectrocatalytic efficiency of 75.2 % under visible light irradiation for Reactive Black 5 dye degradation, which is better than those of the YFeO3 (31.9 %) and CeO2 (46.9 %) electrodes. The improved degradation performance of the YC-30 catalyst can be attributed to its smaller crystallite size, porous structure, and a certain amount of YFeO3/CeO2 heterojunction, which is conducive to the separation of electron-hole pairs owing to electron diffusion driven by the difference in electron density between YFeO3 and CeO2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available