4.7 Article

Global value chains, productivity and markup: Evidence from India

Journal

INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages 250-271

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.10.005

Keywords

Global value chains; Productivity; Markup

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uses large-scale panel data of Indian manufacturing firms at the firm-product level to examine the relationship between global value chain participation and firm performance. The findings indicate that firms participating in the global value chain experience a productivity premium and a decrease in markups, primarily due to rising costs associated with imported intermediate inputs.
In this study, we use large-scale firm-product-level panel data of Indian manufacturing firms to examine the link between global value chain (GVC) participation and firm performance. Using rich product-level information on prices and quantity, we measure firm-product level markup, productivity and examine the impact of GVC participation on these two measures of firm performance. We correct for self-selection induced endogeneity using propensity score matching (PSM) to explore the GVC - productivity/markup nexus. We provide evidence that firms participating in GVCs experience productivity premium. Moreover, the empirical analysis also discerns that GVCs firms observe fall in markups. In this regard, we decompose firms change in markup to price and cost channels and show that the fall in markup is predominantly driven by rising marginal costs of the firm. This can be attributed to the increasing dependence on imported intermediate inputs, which induces rise in costs associated with production in GVCs. We also examine the aforementioned dynamics taking into account firm heterogeneity in terms of size and technology intensity of industries. Our results are robust to alternate measures of GVC, and alternate matching procedures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available