4.7 Article

Developing indicators for sustainable urban regeneration in historic urban areas: Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Journal

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104990

Keywords

sustainable urban regeneration (SUR); Historic urban areas; Sustainability assessment; Indicators; Delphi method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation model for sustainable urban renewal, considering indicators from social, economic, environmental, and governance dimensions. The relative weights of the indicators were determined through a rigorous screening and Delphi survey. The findings highlight the significance of the social dimension in achieving sustainable urban renewal.
This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation model comprising indicators spanning four dimensions: social, economic, environmental, and governance. Extensive indicators were gathered from the literature and subsequently subjected to a rigorous screening, validation, and finalization process by a panel of 25 international experts through a Delphi survey. The relative weights assigned to each indicator were determined utilizing the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The findings reveal that the social dimension carries the greatest significance in achieving sustainable urban renewal (SUR), closely followed by the environmental dimension. In terms of assessment categories, the highest priority and weight (0.1186) were attributed to building and land use, while economic viability (weight=0.1049), policymaking (weight=0.0982), community involvement (weight=0.0882), and housing provision (weight=0.850) were also identified as significant areas. The paper emphasizes that these proposed indicators can serve as valuable tools to inform the review and enhancement of urban planning guidelines and policies at the local, state, and national levels, fostering sustainable urban regeneration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available