Effect of segmental versus lobectomy in minimally invasive surgery on postoperative wound complications in lung cancer patients: A meta-analysis

It is still a matter of debate whether the surgical segmentectomy and lobectomy of lung cancer are comparable in the incidence of perioperative wound complications. An extensive review of the literature through August 2023 was carried out with a critical review of four databases. Following the acceptance and elimination criteria set out in the trial, as well as a qualitative assessment of the literature, this resulted in a review of related research that compared the results of both lobectomy and partial resection in the management of lung cancer. The analysis of the data was performed with the RevMan 5.3 software, and the 95% confidence interval [CI] and odds ratio [OR] were performed with either stationary or random-effect models. It is concluded that the operation time of lobectomy is shorter than that of sectioning in the treatment of segmentectomy (mean difference [MD], -38.62; 95% CI, -41.96, -35.28; p < 0.0001). But the rate of postoperative wound infection (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.18, 2.15; p = 0.45) and intraoperative blood loss (MD, 17.54; 95% CI, -4.19, 39.26; p = 0.11) were not significantly different for them. Thus, for those who have received a pulmonary carcinoma operation, different operative methods might not have an impact on the incidence of postoperative wound infections. The operative procedure appears to have a major impact on the length of the operation in patients.

Automated summary

This study compared the effectiveness of lobectomy and partial resection in the treatment of lung cancer through a comprehensive review of literature. The results showed that lobectomy had shorter operation time, but there were no significant differences in the rate of postoperative wound infection and intraoperative blood loss between the two methods.