4.7 Article

Optimal transport for a novel event description at hadron colliders

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 108, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.096003

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a novel strategy for disentangling proton collisions at hadron colliders, which significantly improves current state-of-the-art methods. By using a graph neural network with a metric inspired by optimal transport problems, the algorithm is able to accurately compare particle collections with different noise levels and identify particles from the main interaction among multiple simultaneous pileup collisions. This approach avoids the need for human annotation and instead obtains labels through a self-supervised process. The results show improved resolution in key objects used in precision measurements and searches, as well as increased sensitivity in searching for exotic Higgs boson decays at the High-Luminosity LHC.
We propose a novel strategy for disentangling proton collisions at hadron colliders such as the LHC that considerably improves over the current state of the art. Employing a metric inspired by optimal transport problems as the cost function of a graph neural network, our algorithm is able to compare two particle collections with different noise levels and learns to flag particles originating from the main interaction amidst products from up to 200 simultaneous pileup collisions. We thereby sidestep the critical task of obtaining a ground truth by labeling particles and avoid arduous human annotation in favor of labels derived in situ through a self-supervised process. We demonstrate how our approach-which, unlike competing algorithms, is trivial to implement-improves the resolution in key objects used in precision measurements and searches alike and present large sensitivity gains in searching for exotic Higgs boson decays at the High-Luminosity LHC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available