4.7 Article

Efficient adsorption of CO2 by amino-functionalized short pore SBA-15: Influence of pore length on adsorption capacity and amino efficiency

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2023.111379

Keywords

Amino-functionalized SBA-15; Carbon dioxide; Pore length; Adsorption capacity; Amino efficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of pore length, temperature, and amino-functionalization on CO2 adsorption by amino-functionalized SBA-15 (AS) was systematically investigated. It was found that the adsorption capacity and amino efficiency strongly depended on the pore length, amino-functionalization, and adsorption temperature. The short pore SAS exhibited the highest adsorption capacity and amino efficiency due to the high utilization of internal pores. Furthermore, the obtained adsorbents showed good temperature adaptability and reusability.
Amino-functionalized SBA-15 (AS) with different pore lengths (short pore: 300 nm, SAS and long pore: several tens mu m, LAS) were synthesized and applied for CO2 adsorption. The adsorption capacity and amino efficiency affected by pore length, temperature and amino-functionalization were systematically investigated. It was found that CO2 adsorption behavior strongly depended on the pore length, amino-functionalization and adsorption temperature. With decreasing pore length, the adsorption capacity and amino efficiency increased. The amino efficiency increased and the adsorption capacity decreased with increasing temperature. The obtained SAS with short pore exhibited the highest adsorption capacity (1.58, 1.26 and 0.96 mmol CO2/g) and amino efficiency (0.07, 0.19 and 0.27 mol CO2/mol N) under 273, 298 and 323 K at 1 bar, respectively, owing to the high uti-lization of internal pores. Furthermore, the obtained adsorbents showed good temperature adaptability and reusability. The results demonstrated the potential of the obtained adsorbents for CO2 adsorption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available