4.5 Article

Aneurysmal bone cysts: A UK wide tumor center experience

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.27499

Keywords

aneurysmal bone cyst; curettage; curopsy; persistence; recurrence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This multicenter retrospective study aimed to identify risk factors for treatment failure in extra-spinal aneurysmal bone cysts. The results showed a high risk of recurrence following surgical treatment, especially in younger patients. However, a substantial number of patients who underwent limited curettage at the time of biopsy had their cyst healed.
Background and Objectives: This multicenter retrospective series of consecutive extra-spinal aneurysmal bone cysts aims to identify risk factors for treatment failure.Methods: Aneurysmal bone cysts treated within seven collaborating centers with over 12-months follow-up were eligible for inclusion. Survival analyses were performed to identify variables associated with recurrence using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazard regression.Results: One hundred and fifteen (M:F 60:55) patients were included. Median age at presentation was 13 years and median follow-up was 27 months. Seventy-five patients underwent surgical curettage and 27% of these required further intervention for recurrence. Of the 30 patients who underwent biopsy with limited percutaneous curettage as initial procedure, 47% required no further treatment. Patients under 13 years (log-rank p = 0.006, HR 2.3, p = 0.011) and those treated who had limited curettage (log-rank p = 0.001, HR 2.7, p = 0.002) had a higher risk of recurrence/persistence.Conclusions: There is a high risk of recurrence following surgical treatment for aneurysmal bone cysts and this risk is higher in young patients. However, the cyst heals in a substantial number of patients who have a limited curettage at the time of biopsy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available