4.5 Article

Balancing acts: The relationship between corporate environmental irresponsibility, charitable donations, and financial performance

Journal

MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/mde.4051

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study empirically examines the relationship between corporate environmental irresponsibility, charitable donations, and financial performance in heavily polluting industries in China. The results demonstrate that higher levels of environmental irresponsibility negatively impact financial performance, but charitable donations can mitigate this negative effect. The study sheds light on the motivations behind firms neglecting environmental responsibilities while engaging in charitable activities, and provides theoretical foundation and policy recommendations to address imbalances in corporate social responsibility.
This study examines the practices of listed firms in heavily polluting industries in China and their approaches to corporate social responsibility. Specifically, it explores the relationship between corporate environmental irresponsibility (CEIR), charitable donations (CD), and financial performance. A sample of Chinese A-share listed firms in heavily polluting industries from 2012 to 2019 is used to empirically test this relationship. The results show that CEIR has a penalty effect on financial performance; firms with higher levels of environmental irresponsibility experience poorer financial performance. However, CD can mitigate this negative impact. This paper sheds light on the underlying motivations of firms neglecting their environmental responsibilities while being diligent in charitable activity. It provides theoretical foundation and policy recommendations for addressing imbalances in corporate social responsibility based on whether firms can offset environmental shortcomings through charitable acts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available