3.8 Article

Looking back into the future of psychoanalysis: A second chance

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aps.1854

Keywords

battle of paradigms; focal epilepsy; hermeneutics; psychiatry & psychoanalysis; scientific research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews the author's 40-year career as a university professor of psychiatry and psychoanalyst, reflecting on the battle between science and hermeneutics in disciplinary paradigms. It discusses the positioning and future of psychoanalysis under new emerging epistemological frameworks.
During the twentieth century took place a battle of paradigms involving all disciplines that inform Psychiatry and Psychology. Basically, the dispute was about the respective contribution of science and hermeneutics in disciplinary paradigms. Psychoanalysis has not been absent from this battle; it is still debated whether psychoanalysis should be considered a scientific discipline or a hermeneutic discipline. In this paper, the author reviews his 40-year career as a university professor of psychiatry and as a psychoanalyst, during which he has been a committed observer and active participant of psychoanalytic and psychiatric disputes. He reflects on how he lived this gap in Psychiatry and Psychoanalysis, and how he sees the future of Psychoanalysis under the light of new emerging epistemological frameworks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available