4.6 Article

Ultrasound and salt reduction effect on physicochemical and rheological properties of meat emulsions

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.16820

Keywords

meat emulsions; quality properties; salt reduction; ultrasound

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of salt reduction and power ultrasound on the physicochemical and rheological properties of meat emulsions were investigated. The results showed that reducing salt and increasing ultrasound time significantly affected various properties such as cooking loss, hardness, viscosity, and color.
Power ultrasound and salt reduction effects on meat emulsions' physicochemical and rheological properties were determined. Therefore, meat emulsions with different NaCl concentrations (1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5%) were treated in an ultrasonic bath (40 kHz, 200 W, & 9.34 W/cm(2) ) at different times (0, 15, and 45 min). Results showed that salt reduction and ultrasound time significantly (p < 0.05) affected the cooking loss, water holding capacity, water activity, pH, color, hardness, viscosity, storage modulus (G'), loss modulus (G ''), and phase angle delta. Meat emulsions with low salt content (1 and 1.5% NaCl) showed significantly higher values of cooking loss than standard emulsions (2.5% NaCl), while ultrasound duration of 15 min reduced the cooking loss (12 to 27%). Hardness, color, pH, and water activity (aw) decreased with salt reduction. Ultrasounds increased the hardness, viscosity, G', and G'' values in reduced-salt meat. The experimental data of apparent viscosity were properly fitted to the mathematical model of Ostwald-de-Waele. Ultrasound increased consistency (k) and decreased flow behavior index (n) in emulsions with 1.5 to 2.5% NaCl. Ultrasound at 15 min induced gelation in emulsions with 1.5 and 2.0% NaCl (40 and 20% NaCl reduction). The formulation with 2.0% NaCl was found to be the maximum concentration that did not sacrifice meat emulsion quality. When combined with 15 min of ultrasound, this formulation yielded results comparable to the standard formulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available