4.2 Article

How a 'good parent' decides on childhood vaccination. Demonstrating independence and deliberation during Dutch healthcare visits

Journal

SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13725

Keywords

childhood vaccination; Conversation Analysis; Discursive Psychology; health communication; identity work; question design

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Childhood vaccination consultations play a crucial role in parents' decision-making process. This study analyzed Dutch vaccination conversations between healthcare providers and parents during routine health consultations, revealing the significant impact of the opening question "Have you already thought about vaccination?" on parental identity construction.
Childhood vaccination consultations are considered an important phase in parents' decision-making process. To date, only a few empirical studies conducted in the United States have investigated real-life consultations. To address this gap, we recorded Dutch vaccination conversations between healthcare providers and parents during routine health consultations for their newborns. The data were analysed using Conversation Analysis and Discursive Psychology. We found that the topic of vaccination was often initiated with 'Have you already thought about vaccination?' (HYATAV), and that this formulation was consequential for parental identity work. Exploring the interactional trajectories engendered by this initiation format we show that: (1) interlocutors treat the question as consisting of two types of queries, (2) conversational trajectories differ according to which of the queries is attended to and that (3) parents work up a 'good parent' identity in response to HYATAV, by demonstrating that they think about their child's vaccination beforehand and make their decisions independently. Our findings shed new light on the interactional unfolding of parental vaccination decisions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available