4.5 Article

Association of daily steps on lipid and glycaemic profiles in children: The mediator role of cardiorespiratory fitness

Journal

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.17035

Keywords

cardiorespiratory fitness; children; daily steps; insulin; triglycerides

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that schoolchildren who accumulate more than 10,000 steps per day have better lipid and metabolic profile. This association does not remain after controlling for cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF).
Aim: To analyse, in schoolchildren, the relationship between daily steps with metabolic parameters; and to examine whether this association is mediated by cardiorespiratory-fitness (CRF).Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a feasibility trial was performed in children from two primary schools in Cuenca, Spain. Daily steps were measured using the Xiaomi MI Band 3. Lipid and glycaemic profiles were analysed from blood samples. CRF was assessed using the 20-m shuttle run test. ANCOVA models were used to test the mean differences by daily steps quartiles. Mediation analyses were conducted to examine whether CRF mediates the association between daily steps and lipid and glycaemic parameters.Results: A total of 159 schoolchildren (aged 9-12 years, 53% female) were included in the analysis. Schoolchildren in the highest daily steps quartiles (>10 000 steps) showed significantly lower triglycerides and insulin levels (p = 0.004 and 0.002, respectively). This association did not remain after controlling for CRF. In mediation analyses, a significant indirect effect was observed through CRF in the relationship between daily steps with triglycerides and insulin.Conclusion: Children who daily accumulate more than 10 000 steps have better lipid and metabolic profile, and CRF mediated their relationship in schoolchildren.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available